Good interview with Julie in particular the discussion around NOT Testifying under OATH or recording the testimony and making it public. Not being under oath they could (did) just lie, lie, lie like they and this administration have done all along. These are akin to regieme show trials as a result.
Didn't Trump give away his reason for wanting to keep the Epstein files away from the public when he told Marjorie Greene that some of his friends would get hurt?
This discussion today was especially interesting in understanding how someone like Bill Gates could become trapped in the Epstein blackmail strategy. And that it reveals such a strategy.
They are not sworn in because the Republican chair rep. Comer refuses to do it because the GOP is actively working to cover for these sex traffickers and abusers. I still think it’s important to have these testimonies because it keeps people talking about it and still gives us information that may be new to some people.
What’s hard about this is women like Leslie graff were roped into crimes with Epstein. So victims well indeed could’ve been co-conspirators. Theres a lot here.
On Page 71, Sarah says she took over for someone that left. How did that person LEAVE? Everyone seems to say how hard it is to leave. Were those who "left" interviewed?
The protocols being followed right now, ie not requiring sworn testimony is a feature of Republican control in the hearings. Once control of Congress changes that can also change. That Garcia continues to point it out stands on its own merit.
What's the legal distinction between "can't lie to Congress" and "under oath"? Is it.. "the whole truth, and nothing but the truth", or have I seen too many movies?
Thanks Vicky. I love seeing my two favorite Journalists together. It's hard to believe that you have been working on since.... it must be 2001. Mercy ! You look too young for that to be possible. Imagine Epstein had the chutzpa to even try to use flattery to manipulate YOU. The new N-word is used too much, but Epstein is definetly a good example of a true NARCISSIST!
Amazing reporting keep it up. And not testifying under oath speaks volumes! What is the point then…I find that infuriating and frustrating.
Typo? Ms. Groff phoned you in 2022?
Thank you! Fixed. 2002
You’re welcome ☺️
I see the 2002 year now, it looks like that posted.
They don’t need to ask, because they know.
Good interview with Julie in particular the discussion around NOT Testifying under OATH or recording the testimony and making it public. Not being under oath they could (did) just lie, lie, lie like they and this administration have done all along. These are akin to regieme show trials as a result.
Didn't Trump give away his reason for wanting to keep the Epstein files away from the public when he told Marjorie Greene that some of his friends would get hurt?
This discussion today was especially interesting in understanding how someone like Bill Gates could become trapped in the Epstein blackmail strategy. And that it reveals such a strategy.
Hey Vicky, maybe you can try to get an interview with Obama & ask him what he thinks about Ruemlers relationship with JE. ?!
They are not sworn in because the Republican chair rep. Comer refuses to do it because the GOP is actively working to cover for these sex traffickers and abusers. I still think it’s important to have these testimonies because it keeps people talking about it and still gives us information that may be new to some people.
What’s hard about this is women like Leslie graff were roped into crimes with Epstein. So victims well indeed could’ve been co-conspirators. Theres a lot here.
On Page 71, Sarah says she took over for someone that left. How did that person LEAVE? Everyone seems to say how hard it is to leave. Were those who "left" interviewed?
The protocols being followed right now, ie not requiring sworn testimony is a feature of Republican control in the hearings. Once control of Congress changes that can also change. That Garcia continues to point it out stands on its own merit.
Exclusive: The Palm Beach cop who Jeffrey Epstein couldn’t stop
By Julie K. Brown
Updated June 6, 2026 11:44 AM
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article315967185.html?giftCode=171a111e460cf9c3e0be730ec794a0e6ac5d97ddedfe45ac36d6ebf5d4462eba
What's the legal distinction between "can't lie to Congress" and "under oath"? Is it.. "the whole truth, and nothing but the truth", or have I seen too many movies?
Gates lied in his opening statement. Lying in front of congress is a crime reagardless of whether you are under oath.
https://efficientsong999.substack.com/p/gates-to-congress-i-never-went-to
I’m speaking to other survivors about this. https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-mystery-of-michele-a-missing-woman-from-germany-reappears-in-the-epstein-files-a-835c0c91-620c-4fd0-ac49-9870fe160108
Trapped? She sold her soul and knew exactly what she was doing.
THE COVERUP becomes clearer & clearer, bolder & bolder more & more CRIMINAL by the day! More will be revealed….
However I don’t believe there will be an end to 40 years of corruption!
We must address & reform our government & get corp. Money OUT of politics & Gov affairs❗️
Demand A recount of 2024. Then, major reset.
Thanks Vicky. I love seeing my two favorite Journalists together. It's hard to believe that you have been working on since.... it must be 2001. Mercy ! You look too young for that to be possible. Imagine Epstein had the chutzpa to even try to use flattery to manipulate YOU. The new N-word is used too much, but Epstein is definetly a good example of a true NARCISSIST!